• stumble
  • youtube
  • linkedin

Archives for : July2018

Mumbai – Residents of Mahul rejects BMC’s Rs.29 cr package for them

Demands rehabilitation in true sense

Mumbai | 11th July: Maharashtra government assured Bombay High Court that Mahul is safe and habitable, ignoring the health issues frequently faced by people living in the region. This assurance is in fact actually fraudulent and even contradicts the government’s own previous statements and studies.

The Pollution Control Board’s report on the high level of pollution in area and the NGT’s observations are proof that the place is uninhabitable. The housing minister has stated categorically that the place is uninhabitable. Police personnel and BMC staff have refused accommodation in Mahul because of the grave health hazards. In spite of this the Maharashtra government has been relocating people from various localities to Mahul.

More than hundred people have already died in Mahul in a period of three years. Most of them became ill after being forcibly relocated here and contracted illness from the extreme pollution and became incurably sick and many eventually died. More and more are complaining that they have contracted severe illnesses after moving to Mahul due to unacceptably high levels of various pollutions.

Mahul is amongst the most industrial dense locations. 3 of the nation’s oldest and largest refineries, one of the largest fertilizer producing complex of RCF and Tata’s many thermal power turbine units are all located there. Additionally Mahul has amongst the largest storing facility for process chemicals, many of which are listed as carcinogenic. The housing complex the Gov has set up is in violation of the regulations of the MoEFguidelines and the Courts’ orders. The safe zone distance from the hazardous facility – recommended minimum is 25 kilometers away- has not been adhered to. The MMRDA housing complex is literally at the boundary of the BPCL refinery at a mere 35 meters- a far cry from the mandated distance as prescribed by even the government agencies.

Given the concentration of the facilities and the scale of operations any evacuation plan will be inadequate in case of an emergency leading to leakage of gases or fire. There is a constant threat to health and life of Mahul residents. In 2003 Mahul was identified as a toxic hotspot similar to what Bhopal was after Union Carbide/Dow disaster.

A study conducted by NEERI found that the level of VOC-Benzene was 158 ug/cum during day time and 248 ug/cum during on 05-01-2018 in Mahul against the permissible limit of 5ug/cum by NAAQS, 2009. This means that the level of Benzene is 3,160% to 5,160% higher than the permissible limit. Exposure to this level of Benzene is life threatening. The ground around the complex is seeping with VOC and this gets into the water pipelines leading to serious diseases.

The Bombay High Court’s order to make Tansa pipeline encroachment free led to those residents being evicted. The Court ordered the government to properly rehabilitate the eligible Tansa residents. However, the government, instead of rehabilitating in the true sense, dumped them in Mahul where even the basic amenities are absent. Additionally there is the extreme pollution causing hazard to life and health there too. The absence of basic amenities like schooling, hospitals, employment opportunities have further made life there in Mahul hell for the residents. The residents say that absence of amenities notwithstanding, it is the extreme health hazard that makes them want to move out of Mahul.

The government move to spend Rs.29cr on bettering the amenities there will be a complete waste as the health hazard due extreme pollution continues to plague Mahul. Pollution is the major reason for the residents wanting to vacate Mahul.

Bilal Khan     Rekha Ghadge    Anita Dhole   B.R. Ver

Related posts

India – Mob lynching: let us act  now


Irfan Engineer

Mob lynching has drastically increased in recent years, particularly since the election of the BJP government. There has been fourfold increase in cow related violent incidents from less than 5% of incidents communal violence in 2010 to 20% in 2017 (Subramanya, 2017). IndiaSpend web portal claimed that 25 persons were killed in 60 incidents of cow related mob violence between 2010 and 25th June 2017 and 97% of the incidents occurred after the BJP took over reigns of the Central Government in 2014 (Abraham & Rao, 2017). 84% of those killed in cow related mob lynching incidents were Muslims. The remaining 16% lynched on accusation of cow slaughter are dalits and other marginalised sections. While most cases of mob violence are related to cow vigilantism, the other triggers have been rumours of child lifting and allegation of being a witch. In the latter case, victims are women.

Centre for Study of Society and Secularism (CSSS) has observed in its monitoring of communal violence in India that after the BJP Government came to power, there has been no incidence of major communal violence as witnessed in Ahmedabad (1969, 1984-85, 2002) Bhiwandi (1970 and 1984), Nellie, Assam, (1983) Delhi anti-Sikh riots (1984), Bhagalpur (1989), Kandhamal anti-Christian riots, (2007 & 2008), Muzaffarnagar (2013). In the year 2014 the incidents of communal violence were lesser compared to previous year. However, the communal attitudes were more heightened on account of hate speeches by leaders of ruling party (Engineer, 2015). The incidence of communal violence increased marginally in the year 2015. However, the number of people killed in communal violence in 2015 decreased from 90 to 84. After the present government came in power, there has been a change of pattern in communal violence. Rather than increase in number of spectacular incidence of communal violence, there has been increase in communal incidences which are of low intensity with no or lesser number of deaths (Dabhade, 2016).

According to Paul Brass (The Production Of Hindu-Mulsim Riot In Contemporary India, 2004), communal riots are produced by, what he calls, Institutionalized Riot System (IRS) whenever political conditions are conducive. Production of communal riots entails conversion of an ordinary everyday minor conflict into a major riot. The political advantage of communal riots until the first decade of 21st century has always been accrued to party that claims to represent the majority community, namely, the Jan Sangh earlier and the BJP.  Jan Sangh earlier and now the BJP has used communal polarization which results after communal violence to its advantage to expand its political influence and political organization. Several Commissions of Inquiry appointed to look into the circumstances that caused communal violence have pointed needle of suspicion towards Hindu supremacist organizations and communal ideologies (Engineer I. , 2013). Of course, Congress too is responsible as it failed to take stern steps to prevent the communal riots and failed to punish those who indulged in producing communal riots.

The Hindu Supremacists now having to come to power do not need spectacular or major communal riots to expand its influence. The same objective can be achieved by hate speeches and broadcasting outrageous anti-minority communal attitudes. Hate speeches stigmatize minorities as compulsive religious converters, terrorists, Pakistan loyalists, separatists, anti-nationals, tukde tukde gang out to break the country into pieces, stealing Hindu women through ‘love jihad’, cow slaughterers, oppressors of Hindus in history, demolishers of Hindu temples, etc. That keeps the communal pot boiling without much attracting adverse media attention or attention of International human rights organizations as it does when major riots and pogroms are orchestrated. While hate speeches are broadcasted by highest officials serving in the government and ruling political party, minorities feel powerless and incapable of countering the slander against them because they get lesser space and time in the media, and duty bearers ignore the slander which is a punishable offence. The low intensity communal violence and hate speeches demonstrate two things – one – superior and unchallengeable might of the Hindu supremacists who are above law; and two – inferior political status – second class citizenship of the minorities. The latter undermines democracy and rule of law.

The IRS now does not have to belabour to produce communal riots. To produce a major communal riot, one has to first mount propaganda war and stigmatize minorities as stated above. Dr. Asghar Ali Engineer called this macro-level factors (On Developing Theory of Communal Riots, 1984). Communal riot can be produced when macro-level factor exists, viz., prejudices against the minority community to be targeted. When political conditions are conducive, the IRS works to instil fear of minority community, deepen communal prejudices and consolidate unity of majority community across castes. Continuous propaganda builds up feelings against minority like pus in an infested wound. This is a necessary but not sufficient condition. Production of communal violence then requires micro-level factor or a triggering issue e.g. Hindu procession taken through a street on which mosque is located and throwing of vermilion on a mosque or a Muslim individual, an interreligious marriage, Muslim hawker beating a cow to shoo it away, any small petty fight between two individuals belonging to different religions, burning of Sabarmati Express in Godhra, etc. The trigger may then set off a riot.

For the riot to be major, other preparations like collection of weapons and ammunitions for inflicting major damage to the ‘other’ community, planning, surveying and marking ‘enemy’ residences and businesses to be targeted, spreading rumours that raise the anxiety of ordinary people and mobilize them on streets to defend themselves. The mobilized crowd then can be misused to attack innocents from the ‘enemy’ community when the anxiety levels are too high.[1]

Mob lynching seems to be continuation of that pattern of low intensity communal violence. The innocuous looking isolated incidents of mob lynching are in fact new pattern of low intensity communal violence. The objectives of sustained communal polarization can now be achieved by this method.

Mob lynching and communal riots

Mob lynching and communal riots both rely on rumours to mobilize crowds on streets to carry perpetrate violence. Rumours are calculated to make people anxious and convert ordinary human beings into a member of lynch mobs. The common rumours during communal riots are – people of the other community have assembled with weapons; Cache of weapons will be landing on Dadar beach, exported by Dawood Ibrahim; weapons are stored in the mosque; milk has been poisoned; drinking water has been poisoned; women of our community have been raped, their breasts cut and bodies thrown on streets; etc.

CSSS in their fact finding have stumbled upon these common rumours. Poisoned milk rumour makes people anxious and mothers do not feed their infants; gullible believers stop drinking water but for how long can they remain thirsty? The rumours of large crowd assembled and marching towards the area with weapons; weapons stored in mosque or to be landed; women raped; etc., draws crowd out of their homes and once on street, can be made to target properties and persons from other communities to vent their anxieties.

Rumours of child lifters on prowl and cow slaughterers are also calculated to make people anxious and bring them out of their homes as in communal riots. People who lynch may be few but large number of spectators intimidate victim into submission and begging for life. The rumours have been carefully designed to mobilize the lynch mob as well – pertaining to innocent child and cow which is worshiped.

The other similarity between communal riot and mob lynching is that both are based on distrust of the state in delivering justice to victims of crime. The rioters and lynch mob want instant justice without investigating into the guilt of the victim and the punishment meted out is as inhuman as possible for the mob, and with the motive of revenge. Qasim in Hapur incident died requesting for water after being lynched. Qasim’s body was then dragged by his hands on his stomach behind a policeman. The Dhule mob wanted to ensure that their victims loaded in police vehicle were dead(Rajput, 2018). Might is right is the rule.

Both pit one marginalized and oppressed community against the other. In communal riots, usually dalits are instigated to attack Muslims and Muslims end up attacking dalits. In Kandhamal riots, adivasi community was made to attack dalit Christians. Both further strengthen the powerful elements and increase asymmetry of power. Both are therefore popular with the mighty and powerful and deepen insecurity within the marginalised communities. Both normalize violence in social life. Both normalize disrespect and contempt for the law of the land, putting their beliefs and faith above law. Lynching and riots, both target ‘outsiders’ – riot targets ‘outsider’ to nation, lynch mobs target outsider to their village or locality.

However, the distinction between communal riot and lynch mob are interesting. Communal riots are with the leit motif of war with the entire ‘enemy’ community – all members and their properties. Mob lynching targets particular individuals who are proclaimed by the mob to be guilty of specific ‘crime’ or ‘wrong doing’. Communal riots mete out collective punishment. All members of ‘enemy’ community are targeted even those innocent and believed to be innocent of any wrong doing other than membership of their community. For example, Muslims in Ahmedabad and other parts of Gujarat can be brutally targeted for wrong doing of burning Sabarmati Express in Godhra. For communal riots, much elaborate preparations and planning are necessary, whereas mob lynching is spontaneous. Targets are not known, even place, region and state where the lynching will be executed is not planned. Broadcasting of rumours using social media platforms and images calculated to arouse anxiety can result into lynching far and wide – Assam, Tripura, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Jharkhand, MP, UP, Rajasthan, Gujarat, Nagaland, etc. Theatre of violence in communal riot is in a defined region where the triggering issue, or as Dr. Asghar Ali Enginer terms, micro-factor has influence.

While rumours of cow slaughter and gangs of cow vigilantes ensured that by and large targets were Muslims – e.g. Mohammed Akhlaq, Pehlu Khan, Junaid, Alimuddin Ansari etc. IndiaSpend report says 84% targets of cow related mob lynching were Muslims. However, only a few Muslims can be targeted through rumours of cow slaughter – those transporting animals or those in possession of beef/meat in public space. To target other Muslims, another rumour was devised – that of child lifter. Carefully chosen rumour. Poison milk and child lifter – both rely on anxiety of parents for their innocent children. It was further rumoured that the child lifters are extracting organs from the body of kidnapped children. The video images of child lifter on prowl were that of a burqa clad individual must have hoped that members of Muslim community will be targeted as child lifters as in case of cow slaughter related mob lynching.

The results in the case of rumours pertaining to child lifters on prowl seem to have gone horribly wrong – even non-Muslim strangers from marginalised sections were easily believed to be child lifters and lynched. The community wise break up of survivors of child lifter lynching incidents show most of them are nomadic tribes – street performers, beggars, etc. While communal riots and rumours of cow slaughter ensure victims are by and large Muslims, rumours of child lifters have not. The state is therefore now taking decisive action – compensation for the survivors of the lynch mobs, booking those involved in lynching after examining video clips and countering rumours in Assam, Tripura and Maharashtra.

Role of the state

In cow slaughter accusation related mob lynchings, the state has played a role of selective enforcer of law – book the survivors of the violence under stringent provision of anti-cow slaughter legislation and a reluctant prosecutor of those involved in serious crime of lynching that has even resulted in murder of the victim. This appears to be so as the targets are primarily Muslims. In Pehlu Khan lynching case in Rajasthan, the state not only did not file any charge sheet against the accused, it actually filed cases against the survivors of the lynching. A Hindu supremacist Kamal Didi encouraged the accused of Pehlu Khan’s murder – Vipin Yadav by comparing him and his act with the great freedom fighter Bhagat Singh! (PTI, 2017). In Mohammed Akhlaq’s case, (Dadri, UP) the state sent the meat found in his fridge for forensic tests to find out whether it was beef or not, although it is not a crime to possess beef in UP.

In spite of repeated calls, police normally arrive after the lynching is over. In some cases, more as an exception rather than norm, the police have done exemplary deed in preventing / rescuing the survivor of lynching. In case of lynching in Hapur, the police not only reached after the lynching had resulted in death of Qasim in spite of repeated pleas from his loved ones, a policeman is seen walking ahead of the mob that is dragging the body of Qasim! Later for strange reason the police claimed that the lynching was in fact road rage when the video clearly show the intent of the mob that is charging Qasim and his friend Samiuddin with cow slaughter.

The BJP leaders and ministers defend those accused of lynching. The 11 who were convicted for murder by the trial court in the case of lynching of Alimuddin Ansari, the Jharkhand State president of the BJP was competing with the Union Minister Jayant Sinha for credit of obtaining bail for the accuse from Jharkhand High Court. Jayant Sinha felicitated the convicts who were enlarged on bail pending their appeal in High Court. With BJP leaders and ministers backing the accused of murder by lynching the police sends a signal to law enforcing agencies as to how seriously they must investigate and prosecute such crimes. People, particularly those sections with some political connection and drawn from dominant sections trust the environment of impunity. They are so fearless that they video graph their act and make it viral and hope to achieve fame. Overall the state seems to be twiddling its thumbs and looking the other side giving the impression that it is alright to indulge in lynching Muslims to death.

It is only now that the lynching is acquiring threatening level wherein non-Muslims are also being lynched that the state has in some cases related to child lifting appearing to tighten its act. Two months before the 5 men from nomadic tribe were lynched to death in Dhule, the Gosavi community had approached police to issue them letters. The rumours were doing rounds for over two months and the administration completely ignored them. A stern warning from the police of booking all violators of law would have sent the message and deterred the mob from lynching the 5 innocent men. But then who knew that the victims are going to be non-Muslims.


Mob lynching is unacceptable in any civilized society. It is rule of might, not right and not rule of law. Lynching of blacks in US from 1877 through 1950 had similar objectives – to assert the hegemony of white people and to terrorize and control black people into submission (Lartey & Morris, 2018). All those lynched were black people on flimsiest of accusation which were false in most cases. To the white people, blacks did not deserve any trial, as they were slaves of yesteryears. They deserved only lynch mob justice. By and large no one was punished for lynching in US for 4,084 known lynchings in southern states and 300 in other states. The lynchings came to an end with civil rights movement.

Savarkar and Golwalkar, the ideologues of Hindutva political ideology, portrayed Muslims and Christians as outsiders of Hindu nation. The Hindu nation was supposed to be at war with the outsiders. Golwalkar in his treaties “We or Our Nationhood Defined” canvassed for treating the Muslims and Christians the same way as Jews were by Hitler. Earlier communal riots and now lynching seems to be another war of followers of Hindutva political ideology targeting Muslims.

It is not only death and injuries that should worry us about mob lynching incident. Survival of democracy, rule of law and justice is at stake. Prime Minister’s silence in spite of drastic increase in the incidents of mob lynching tells us about the priorities and the direction of his government. Hindu supremacists always ridiculed secularism and openly proclaim that for them, their faith is above law and that the state should be reshaped to uphold not truth and justice, but primacy of their beliefs. The frequency of hate speeches by the ministers and authorities in government targeting Muslim community has built an ecosystem in which lynching and ‘might is right’ doctrine is thriving. Lynching is encouraged by leaders of the ruling party and even ministers indirectly by garlanding and felicitating those convicted for the crime of lynching and publicly defending them.

Lynching results in increasing asymmetry of power and social capital. It enables the targeted community to be controlled even more by the dominant community. If lynching continues unabated, it would ultimately reduce the Muslim community to accept the status of non-citizens residing at the mercy and sufferance of the majority community, using them as slave labour without any rights. To some this warning may appear to be farfetched. It is for us to arrest the frequency and brutality of lynchings by compelling the state to act against the lynch mobs in accordance with law. Lynching not only dehumanizes the targeted community, but also the entire society. Let us act now before it is too late to uphold human rights, rule of law and democracy.


Abraham, D., & Rao, O. (2017, June 28). 84% Dead In Cow-Related Violence Since 2010 Are Muslim; 97% Attacks After 2014. Retrieved July 3, 2018, from IndiaSpend:

Brass, P. R. (2004). Development Of An Institutionalsied Riot System In Meerut City, 1961 to 1982. Economic and Political Weekly Vol.XXXIX No. 44, October 30-November 5, 2004 , 4839-4848.

Brass, P. R. (2004). The Production Of Hindu-Mulsim Riot In Contemporary India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Dabhade, N. (2016, January 1). Communal Violence in 2015 – Rise in Hatred and Polarization. Retrieved January 10, 2018, from Centre for Study of Society and Secularism:

Engineer, A. A. (1984). On Developing Theory of Communal Riots. Mumbai: Institute of Islamic Studies.

Engineer, I. A. (2013). Issues of Communal Violence: Causes and Resonses. Mumbai: Institute for Peace Studies and Conflict Resolution.

Engineer, I. (2015, January 1). Communal incidents less compared to previous year, however, communalisation of attitudes more intense. Retrieved July 10, 2018, from Centre for Study of Society and Secularism:

Engineer, I. (2013, October 16). Sangh Parivar and Communal Riots. Retrieved July 10, 2018, from Centre for Study of Society and Secularism:

Express News Service. (2018, June 23). Hapur attack victim’s brother: FIR not lodged as per our choice…we are scared. The Indian Express .

Hafeez, M. (2018, July 3). Now, group of 5 saved from being lynched in Malegaon. Retrieved July 3, 2018, from The Times of India:

Karmakar, R. (2018, June 26). Eight arrested in Assam for moral policing, assault. The Hindu .

Lartey, J., & Morris, S. (2018, April 26). How white Americans used lynchings to terrorize and control black people. Retrieved July 11, 2018, from The Guardian:

Naveen, P. (2018, June 19). WhatsApp rumour drives MP mob to nearly kill 2. The Times of India .

Pandey, P. (2018, June 16). ‘Easy for them, nothing to invest, everything to gain’. The Indian Express .

PTI. (2017, April 20). Sadhvi equates Alwar lynching case accused with Bhagat Singh. Retrieved July 11, 2018, from The Hindu:

Rajput, R. (2018, July 3). Dhule mob thumbed nose at police: They are dead, take them away. Retrieved July 3, 2018, from The Indian Express:

Saha, A. (2018, June 29). 30-year-old lynched in Tripura over suspicin of ‘child-lifting’. The Indian Express .

Subramanya, R. (2017, July 1). Has India become “Lynchistan”? Retrieved July 3, 2018, from Observer Research Foundation:

Syed a, R. (2018, June 19). Aurangabad man suspected to be thief thrashed, 15 booked. The Times of India .

Syed, R. (2018, June 16). Mob attacks two street performers in Aurangabad over talk of child-lifting. The Times of India .

The Hindu. (2018, May 12). Loss of innocents: on the wave of lynchings in Tamil Nadu. Retrieved July 3, 2018, from The Hindu:

TNN. (2018, June 28). Rumours triger fresh mob attacks in MP. The Times of India .


[1] For more elaborate account of communal riots and its production, read (Engineer I. A., 2013)

Related posts

Sec 377: SC wants to get out of ‘mess created by ’13 order’ #LGBTQ

Plea To Legalise Gay Sex Off To Quick Start

New Delhi:

The Supreme Court on Tuesday indicated that it would focus closely on the question whether Section 377 of IPC, which makes gay sex an offence, should be decriminalised, raising hope of speedy proceedings that could end the lingering and contentious issue of LGBTQ rights.

During the day-long hearing before a bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices R F Nariman, A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra, clear signals emerged in favour of decriminalising Section 377, which the Delhi high court had in 2009 ruled in favour of, only to be reversed by a two-judge SC bench in 2013 in Suresh Kumar Koushal vs Naz Foundation case.

In the course of the hearing, the bench said it only intended to get out of the “mess” created by the Suresh Koushal judgement.

The court made it evident that it was disinclined to examine wider issues relating to gay rights when, appearing for petitioners led by dancer Navtej Singh Johar, former attorney general Mukul Rohatgi, advocates Arvind Datar and Saurabh Kirpal argued for not only decriminalisation of Section 377 but also a clear enunciation on the right to choose same sex partners. They said this was part of the fundamental right to privacy and choice, both intrinsic to right to life.

But the CJI-headed apex court bench said, “We will deal with the constitutional validity of Section 377 alone. Whatever rights or disputes that are linked to relationships between same sex partners as a consequence of the Supreme Court’s determination of constitutional validity of Section 377 will be dealt with as and when they arise. We cannot give an advanced ruling on such future consequences to our ruling on Section 377,” it said.

Significantly, additional solicitor general Tushar Mehta, who told the court that he would convey the Centre’s stand during the hearing, agreed with the court and said the Centre was also of the view that the arguments should be confined to the issue relating to validity of Section 377. The hearing on Tuesday went at a fast clip, with Rohatgi, Datar and Kirpal concluding their arguments. The Centre must present its stand on validity of Section 377 in a day or two.

Interestingly, the UPA government had in 2009 accepted the Delhi HC judgment and did not appeal against it in the SC. When Suresh Koushal filed an appeal, the home ministry in 2013 argued against decriminalising gay sex and opposed legalising same sex relationships.

 LGBTQ community needs protection’

But the health ministry advocated a compassionate view on the LGBTQ community’s rights.

Political parties, fearing a conservative backlash, have avoided public comment or even considered amending the law to make it more equitable for the LGBTQ community which faces hostility of society and is often harassed by police. This is in contrast with vocal articulation of caste rights or the polarised but voluble debate on triple talaq and polygamy.

When the SC said it only intended to get out of the “mess” created by the Suresh Koushal judgment, Rohatgi said not much persuasion was required on that count as the nine-judge bench ruling on right to privacy would take the petitioners “home and dry”. He said the issue was settled by Justice Chandrachud’s judgment, which was written for him and on behalf of three other judges. With Justice S K Kaul agreeing with him, five out of nine judges ruled that the SC’s 2013 judgment upholding constitutional validity of Section 377 was wrong.

Justice Chandrachud had termed the Koushal judgment a “discordant note which directly bears upon the evolution of constitutional jurisprudence on the right to privacy”. He had said, “Equality demands that sexual orientation of each individual in society must be protected on an even platform. The right to privacy and protection of sexual orientation lies at the core of fundamental rights guaranteed by Articles 14, 15 and 21of the Constitution.We disagree with the manner in which Koushal has dealt with the privacy-dignity based claims of LGBT persons on this aspect.”

Rohatgi said the sexual preferences of the LGBTQ community, which had been discriminated against for centuries because of a Victorian-era law enacted in 1860, “is immutable and not a medical condition to be cured. Such individuals live with this orientation and they do not consider the same to be either wrong, unnatural or against the ‘laws of nature/ order of nature’ because it is nature which has given them the particular orientation”.

He added, “Such individuals need protection, more so than those having more common orientation (heterosexual), to achieve their full potential, to live freely, without fear, apprehension and trepidation and not be discriminated against by society, openly or insidiously, or by state in matters of employment, choice of partner, healthcare or any other right.”

Mukul Rohatgi rushed from SC to AIIMS

Minutes after completing arguments in the SC seeking to decriminalise Section 377, former AG Mukul Rohatgi felt uneasy around 1pm and was rushed to AIIMS. He was admitted to the cardiology department CCU under Dr V K Bahl, who conducted a check-up and found his vital parameters normal. He was administered medicines to normalise his heart rate. He has been kept under observation for the next two days and advised not to attend court. TNN

Related posts