Kractivism

-Bridge the Gap Bring the Change

Tag

UPA

Modi Govt likely to prepare a new industry-friendly Mining law #WTFnews

Govt may bury UPA’s mining law draft Mineral output has been shrinking significantly in recent years due to judicial oversight of mining in key states such as Karnataka, Goa and Odisha. ET SPECIAL: Save precious time tracking your investments NEW… Continue Reading →

Decoding Verdict – Why voters punished UPA ?

If anything, the UPA has been punished by the voters for moving away from its core agenda of entitlement-based politics Himanshu The fact that the UPA had moved away from its commitment to the aam aadmi and the agenda of inclusive politics was clear… Continue Reading →

Congress and BJP Manifesto – Real differences

The very real differences between the BJP and Congress agendas A look at the manifestos of the Congress and the BJP and what they offer to the voters Mihir S Sharma  |  <news:geo_locations>New Delhi  April 7, 2014 Last Updated at 16:25 IST… Continue Reading →

Why did UPA government sleep on decriminalisation of #Sec377

  Kamayani Bali Mahabal aka Kracktivist   Why did UPA government sleep on decriminalisation of Sec 377   Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860, that criminalises gay sex has remained in the statute book for over 150 years. The Delhi High Court had simply asked Parliament to have a relook at it and till then had only decriminalised gay sex between consenting adults in private. Section 377 IPC was not struck down wholly.. Last year the  Supreme Court (SC) has also tossed the ball into Parliament’s court, but the interim 1elief the Delhi HC had granted has been denied. Its an interim relief since the interim period till Parliament should have chosen to amend the law ought not to have been more than a few months from July 2, 2009, when Sadly, the government chose not to act for more than four years. For any legislative business to be transacted, it is for the government of the day to swing into action. Reflecting complete policy paralysis, two wings of the government, the health ministry and the home ministry, took a diametrically conflicting stand on the issue. The SC judgment reflects that a law officer of the government, on behalf of the ministry of home affairs, referred to the affidavit filed before the Delhi HC wherein the government had opposed decriminalisation of homosexuality and argued that in its 42nd report, the Law Commission had recommended retention of Section 377 IPC because societal disapproval thereof was very strong.It was categorically argued by the government’s law officer that the legislature had decided not to delete it and it was not for the court to import extraordinary moral values and thrust them on society. The prime reasoning reflected in the judgement of the apex court is flawed. The SC’s observation that only a fraction of the country’s population constitutes lesbians, gays, bisexuals or transgenders and, therefore, Section 377 cannot be declared ultra vires of constitutional provisions is contrary to basic tenets of minority rights. UPA government  rushed to trash the Supreme Court’s judgment upholding the validity of Section 377 IPC but have failed to act on the Law Commission’s 13-year-old recommendation for its deletion. The law commission recommended changes in Section 375, IPC and scrapping of Section 377.  “In the light of the change effected by us in Section 375 IPC, we are of the opinion that Section 377 deserves to be deleted. After the changes effected by us in the preceding provisions (Sections 375 to 376E), the only content left in Section 377 is having voluntary carnal intercourse with any animal. We may leave such persons to their just deserts.” Why did UPA government chose not touch Section 377, despite a bunch of petitions against it pending in the Delhi High Court and later in the Supreme Court for 12 years. ? The Commission recommendation gathered dust in the law ministry, there was a slew of amendments carried out by the government to make provisions in IPC more stringent in the aftermath of the December 16 fatal gangrape case and focused on sexual offences, it did not change anything in Section 377. That was evidently the will of Parliament. It ‘s clear the Government acknowledges the perils of contradictions and opposition not only from religious organisations and opposition parties but also from within its own party and allies, and with the next general election near, does not want to rake up another hullabaloo.After the adoption of the IPC in 1950, around 3 0 amendments have been made to the statute, the most recent being in 2013 which specifically deals with sexual offences, a category to which Section 377 belongs. The UPA government wants to run with the hare and hunt with the hounds, and that is why it is urging the court to decide. Parliament has often criticised the Supreme Court for “judicial overreach” and “judicial law making”. And yes, under the Constitution, the right place to make or change a law is Parliament; Section 377 should be no exception. Powered by Blogmint” www.blogmint.com   Related posts UPA-II failed to deliver on its promises: Aruna Roy’s report card (0) Supreme Court Judgement – #Sec377 and… Continue Reading →

#India – Effective PDS lifted 38 million people out of poverty in 2009-10

Case for food security: Effective PDS implementation by states has helped pull millions out of poverty By Avinash Celestine, ET Bureau | 10 Nov, 2013, ​New research argues that the public distribution system lifted 38 million people out of poverty in… Continue Reading →

#India – NDA vs. UPA Performance #mustread

Shabnam Hashmi While one can look for options of choosing a third front which will re-look at economic policies but if one has to compare the figures of UPA and NDA here they are: UPA AND NDA FIGURES (1) GROSS… Continue Reading →

#India – Supreme Court’s order trashes UPA’s Aadhaar #saynotouid

 by FP Editors The Supreme Court has in an interim order said that Aadhaar should not be made mandatory and asked the government not to link it to welfare schemes. It also said that illegal immigrants should not be issued… Continue Reading →

UPA-II failed to deliver on its promises: Aruna Roy’s report card

by Pallavi Polanki May 25, 2013  National Advisory Council (NAC) member and leading social activist Aruna Roy has come down heavily on the government for its poor performance in the social sector. Roy, an instrumental force behind the Right to… Continue Reading →

#India – Why is the UPA Reluctant to debate and Legislate ? #UID #Aadhaar

By- Politically Incorrect at  http://centreright.in/ “What is so wrong about the UID project? It isn’t like the Government is asking for details that are not publicly available or which we haven’t furnished to tax authorities or for getting a driving… Continue Reading →

© 2019 Kractivism — Powered by WordPress

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑